|
When this Pulitzer Prize-winning biography first
appeared in 1976, it rescued T. E. Lawrence from the mythologizing
that had seemed to be his fate. In it, Harvard professor of psychiatry
Dr. John Mack humanely and objectively explores the relationship
between Lawrence's inner life and his historically significant actions.
Extensive interviews, far-flung correspondence, access to War Office
dispatches and unpublished letters provide the basis for Mack's
sensitive investigation of the psychiatric dimensions of Lawrence's
personality. In addition, Mack examines the pertinent history, politics,
and sociology of the time in order to weigh the real forces with
which Lawrence contended and which impinged upon him.
We are not likely to get as thorough and judicious a
biography of T. E. Lawrence for some time.
New York Times Book Review
A
great book which honors its subject, its form, and its author.
Boston Sunday Globe
Mack's
handling of this information is a model of sensitive psychoanalytical expertise.
Newsweek
Takes
us closer to the core of Lawrence than any previous biography.
Time
A
hugely admired, and Pulitzer prize-winning, biography which concentrates
on the relationship between Lawrence's inner life and the actions
and events which grew out of them. It is easy to warm to a biographer
who, while drawing on his training as a psychiatrist, is never
deceived into thinking that theory can 'explain' his Lawrence.
The more Mack discovered about the social contexts of Lawrence's
actions and the demands on a public man, the more he understood
Lawrence's psychology. The result is a resounding confirmation
of this approach to his subject.
Desmond Christy,
The Guardian
Unlike
many 'psycho-biographies', this was written by a trained psychologist
who had also done his biographer's homework: it remains the best
biography of T.E. Lawrence.
Contemporary Review
PREFACE
TO THE 1998 EDITION
|
Looking back over more than two decades since publication
of the first edition of A Prince of Our Disorder, I find
myself asking what now seems most significant about the life of
T. E. Lawrence.
The answer appears curiously clear
to me and has to do with Lawrence's place among our evolving definitions
of political responsibility. In my view he was ahead of his time
in this respect, and his odd martyrdom can be seen as a contemporary
version of what is likely to befall a person who takes exaggerated
individual moral responsibility in a turbulent political arena.
Ethnonational conflict is the dominant
context in which peoples in the Middle East, and now throughout
the world, seek to define and express their political and personal
identities, most often at the expense of other peoples who define
themselves in terms of the same piece of land. Lawrence saw clearly
the terrible menace of such conflict, especially when potentiated
by religious emotion. To man rational, he wrote in Seven
Pillars of Wisdom (1935), the epic story of his participation
in the Arab Revolt of 1916-1918, wars of nationality were
as much a cheat as religious wars, and nothing was worth fighting
for: nor could fighting, the act of fighting, hold any meed of intrinsic
virtue. Lawrence's experiences in the war led to a kind of
reverent pacifism. Life, this passage continues, was
so deliberately private that no circumstances could justify one
man in laying violent hands upon another's (p. 548).
Lawrence was far ahead of his time
in appreciating the central importance of self-knowledge, of awareness
of deeper personal motives on the part of a person who would be
an agent of change in a large political drama. Of his motivation
in the Arab Revolt, Lawrence wrote, The self-immolated victim
took for his own the rare gift of sacrifice; and no pride and few
pleasures in the world were so joyful, so rich as this choosing
voluntarily another's evil to protect the self. There was a hidden
selfishness in it as in all perfections (Seven Pillars
of Wisdom, p. 550).
T. E. Lawrence lived out the transnational
vision that is expressed in the second of the quotes I chose as
epigraphs at the beginning of this book, a passage whose grandeur
verges on the grandiose in the extreme assignment of self-responsibility.
But it is precisely for this reason, this too heavy assumption of
the burdens of consciousness ranging from the personal to the global,
that T. E. Lawrence remains, in Irving Howe' felicitous phrase,
a prince of our disorder.
John
E. Mack, M.D.
INTERVIEW
WITH THE AUTHOR
|
Pulitzer Prize Awarded to John
Mack For Biography of 'Lawrence of Arabia': Mack Retraces 12 Years
of Research for T.E. Lawrence Biography
Harvard University Gazette
April 22, 1977, Vol. LXXII, No. 28
"Dr. Mack?"
"Yes."
"This is the Harvard News Office calling. May
we send a photographer and writer to you in about half an hour?"
"Sure, but why?"
"Don't you know?"
"Don't I know what?"
"You've just been awarded the Pulitzer Prize."
Dr. John E. Mack, Professor and head of the Harvard
Medical School Department of Psychiatry at the Cambridge Hospital,
and Director of Education at the Cambridge-Somerville Mental Health
Center, had worked for 12 years on his biography, A Prince of
Our Disorder: The Life of T.E. Lawrence. His research had led
him-on a camel-to the fabled Gulf of Aqaba; aboard the British rails
to Oxford and its Bodleian Library; and through the winding, cobbled
lanes of Delvin, County Westmeath in Ireland and to Tremadoc in
Wales, where Lawrence of Arabia was born.
For Dr. Mack, a practicing psychoanalyst, this was
his first biography, although lie is the author of a classic psychiatric
text, Nightmares and Human Conflict, and is the editor of
Borderline States in Psychiatry. The 47-year-old New York
City-born physician, lives in Chestnut Hill with his wife, Sally,
a psychiatric social worker, and their three sons, Danny, Kenny,
and Tony.
Amid the happy hubbub of telephones ringing ("The
New York Times is on hold," "Bob Coles just called to
say, 'TRIPLE CONGRATULATIONS'" "The Associated Press wants
to know when you were born.. .") , Dr. Mack was interviewed
by the Gazette.
Q. As a psychoanalyst, what was Lawrence's special
appeal to you? How were you "hooked?"
A. I became hooked by Lawrence because he was extraordinary
for a public figure, a military commander, in the degree to. which
he was involved with exploring his own inner life. Lawrence, himself
asked what was propelling him, what was the meaning of what he was
doing, what was his own purpose in getting involved with the Arab
revolt, how did it relate to his own personal de velopment. He was
interested in the rela-tionship of his adult actions to his youth-ful
readings of chivalric romances: how they related to his concerns
with the Crusade, his ideas of heroism, redemp-tion, renunciation,
self-sacrifice. He ex-plored all of this in Seven Pillars of Wisdom,
and in his correspondence. He also had a great gift for psychological
insight.
Q. How did you react to his extraordinary self-exploration?
A. I felt that here was something that could overcome
the familiar accusation that the writer is imposing psychological
interpretations on a person who is dead and about whom there is
no data. I felt this accusation would no longer be valid if the
information on Lawrence were used critically but thoroughly. Also,
Lawrence was sufficiently our contemporary that I was able to conduct
extensive interviews with people who had known him very well.
Q. How did you get in touch with these people,
most of whom were in England or the Middle East?
A. Initially, I wrote to Lawrence's older brother
who had been a medical missionary. I approached him as one physician
to another, who had felt very much affected by his brother's life
and suffering and struggles, and was interested in talking with
him. I also met Lawrence's younger brother, an archaeologist who
was his literary executor, who was extremely helpful to me in gaining
access to embargoed papers at the Bodleian Library and worked with
me conscientiously over the next decade to enable this book to exist.
Q. Were there any problems with Lawrence's brother
when it came to your writing about some of t he more intimate of
his personal problems-for example, his apparent need for being whipped?
A. Yes. There were, some rough moments for him when
the flagellation episodewhich he had known aboutcame
up. He became troubled when the details of it were put into one
long chapter. He was troubled about the possible effects that chapter
might have. But he never swayed in his support and I have enormous
gratitude to him and to his wife for their steadfastness.
Q. In the hundreds of interviews you conducted
for the bookfrom Lowell Thomas to Basil Liddell Hart to Howeitat
tribesmen in Jordanhow do you think your psychoanalytic background
affected your handling of the material?
A. I think that understanding of motivation, of the
bringing to bear of the conflicts in one's life and to one's public
actions can be appreciated by such a study. I feel there is a need
to know more about the psychological development, strengths, vulnerabilities,
of leaders,
Q. Is there a single theme in the book that you
feel particularly benefited from your psychoanalytic training?
A. Yes. The whole question of heroism and Lawrence's
need to be heroic. Lawrence's mother and father never married. He
was the second of five illegitimate sons who was raised in a very
strict home. His parents were members of an evangelical sect of
the English Church and Lawrence was early impressed by this God-fearing,
Bible-reading environment.
But he was also aware of a degree of conflict between
this very strict obedience to God and the Bible and the fact that
his parents were living in sin. Like many children, he fantasized
that his father had once been part of a heroic race of aristocratic
giants, and he was encouraged in such fantasies by a mother who
felt that she, too, had fallen from a state of grace. She sought
to redeem, through her chil-dren, her own fall. One son did indeed
become a medical missionary, another provided Christian teachings
in India, and T.E., though not consciously, seemed to need to redeem
his family's fall from grace.
Lawrence sought, through his public actions, to restore
the heroic image that he grew up holding in his mind. I'm not saying
that he deliberately set out to do this, but I do believe that this
was a force behind his public actions. He studied Arabic, became
an expert in military history , and he adapted this information
to leading a glorious campaign.
Q. So you think that your psychiatric training
predisposed you to make these connections between Lawrence's childhood
fantasies and his adult public life?
A. I think psychiatric training and experience in
working with psychological histories is helpful in terms of the
necessity for interweaving the themes that occur in Lawrence's life:
the childhood fantasies about the heroic past from which he is descended,
the desire to redeem a fallen family state, the desire to liberate
a people and thereby recapture the chivalric ideals, in which he
had become steeped from adolescence. Psychiatric training does not
help you in learning historythat you have to do on your ownbut
it does help you in interviewing.
Q. How does being a psychiatrist make the kind
of interviewing you were able to do different from the kind of interviewing
that, say, a journalist might do?
A. That's a very difficult. question. By being a
psychiatrist I may have been particularly sensitive to his personal
relationships. You can tune in to the quality of the attachment
between a particular person and Lawrence, in terms of what it was
that was meaningful to the person about his or her relationship
with Lawrence. It was often then possible to enlist his former friends
as collaborators in the project.
Q. Did you encounter any suspicion toward you
because of your being a psychiatrist?
A. Yes, but the funny part of it is that despite
people's suspicion, they nevertheless would end up pouring out a
great deal of information saying, "Well, since you're a psychiatrist,
you'd certainly be interested in this. . . ."
Q. What are some biographies that you've liked?
A. Henri Troyat's biography of Tolstoi Justin
Kaplan's biography of Mark Twain, Alexander and Juliet George on
Woodrow Wilson. Erik Erikson's work is, of course, crucial to this
whole field, and I owe him a great debt.
CONTENTS
|
Preface, 1998
Introduction
Family
Background and Childhood
Chapmans and Lawrences
Childhood and Adolescence
Lawrence and His Family: The Burden of Illegitimacy
Youth
Introduction
Literary Influences
Crusader Castles
Lawrence at Jesus College, 1907-1910
The First Trip to the Middle East, 1909
Lawrence at Carchemish
The Epic Dream and the Fact of War
The
War Years, 1914-1918
Introduction
The Background of the Arab Revolt
Two Years in Cairo, 1914-1916
The Course of the Arab Revolt
The Capture of Damascus
The Achievements of "Aurens"
The Question of Motivation
Lawrence the Enabler
The Conflict of Responsibility
The Heroic Legend and the Hero
The Shattering of the Dream
The
Political Years, 1918-1922
Introduction
Arab Self-determination and Arab Unity
Leaving Damascus Behind
At the Paris Peace Conference
Return to England: London and All Souls
Lawrence and Churchill: The Political Settlements in the Middle
East
The
Years in the Ranks, 1922-1935
The Service Years: An Overview
Ross: The First RAF Enlistment
The Years in the Tanks
Cranwell
India
Mount Batten
Boats, Boats, Boats
Retirement and Death
Further
Dimensions
Intimacy, Sexuality and Penance
Lawrence Assayed
Appendix: Twenty-Seven Articles
Chapter Notes
Bibliography
Copyright Acknowledgments
Index

Trade Paperback Edition
from Harvard University Press
5
x 7 3/4 inches, 27 halftones
608 pages
|